# The Control Map: Every SI Safety Law in the World > Every SI safety law and rule in the world on one map: 43 measures in 22 jurisdictions with status, key dates, US state laws and lab safety policies. Source: https://enterrsi.si/control-map/ Updated: 2026-11-08 1. [Home](https://enterrsi.si/) 2. Control Map The Control Map · updated Nov 8, 2026 # The Control Map The Control Map shows the laws, rules and commitments that govern advanced SI safety around the world, on one map. It tracks **43 measures in 22 jurisdictions**, from the EU AI Act to California's SB 53, plus the safety policies of 8 leading labs. As of November 8, 2026, 12 measures are in force, 5 have passed and wait to take effect, 3 are proposed and 20 are voluntary. Jurisdictions : 22 Measures : 43 In force : 12 Dates ahead : 10 The map ## Who governs SI safety, and how hard Each country takes the color of its strongest measure: in force beats passed, then voluntary, proposed and stalled. EU members share the European Union's rules. Select one to see its measures. US states are listed below the map. Singapore is shown as a dot. International bodies have their own cards. Selected · tap or click the map ### European Union In force The EU AI Act is the broadest binding regime covering the most capable general purpose SI models: their obligations have applied since August 2, 2025, and the European Commission's AI Office gained enforcement and fining powers on August 2, 2026, sending its first formal information requests to leading providers in October 2026. The Digital Omnibus on AI, in force since July 27, 2026, pushed high-risk system rules back to December 2027 and August 2028 but did not delay the general purpose model duties. The EU also ratified the Council of Europe SI treaty on May 15, 2026. [All European Union measures](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/european-union/) 3 measures - In force **EU AI Act (GPAI)** Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act), Chapter V: obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models · next step Aug 2, 2027 - Voluntary or guidance **GPAI Code of Practice (Safety and Security)** General-Purpose AI Code of Practice: Safety and Security Chapter - In force **AI Omnibus** Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (Digital Omnibus on AI) · next step Dec 2, 2026 United States ## Federal rules and five state laws Washington has executive orders and voluntary frameworks but no frontier safety statute yet. States moved first: California, New York, Illinois, Colorado and Texas. Federal · 6 measures ### [United States (federal)](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/us/) No federal statute imposes safety duties on frontier SI developers; federal policy runs through executive orders and voluntary testing. EO 14365 seeks to displace state SI laws through litigation and funding conditions, and EO 14434 of September 29, 2026 renamed the field Super Intelligence across the executive branch and requires proposed statutory definition language by November 28, 2026. Frontier model testing is voluntary through NIST's CAISSI, and the bipartisan FRONTIER Act (H.R. 9925) is pending in committee. [Details and sources](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/us/) - In force **EO 14434** Executive Order 14434, Inaugurating the Era of Super Intelligence · next step Nov 28, 2026 - In force **EO 14365** Executive Order 14365, Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence - Voluntary or guidance **AI Action Plan** Winning the Race: America's AI Action Plan - Voluntary or guidance **National Policy Framework** National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence - Voluntary or guidance **CAISSI** Center for Advancing Innovation and Standards for Super Intelligence (CAISSI), NIST - Proposed **FRONTIER Act** Frontier Risk Oversight, National Transparency, Independent Evaluation, and Reporting Act (FRONTIER Act), H.R. 9925 State · 3 measures ### [California](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/california/) California was the first state with a statute aimed at frontier SI developers: SB 53 has required published safety frameworks, transparency reports and incident reporting since January 1, 2026. In September 2026 the state added SB 813, a voluntary system for designating independent verification organizations, and Executive Order N-9-26, which asks for recommendations by November 16, 2026 on onsite lab audits, a frontier model kill switch and reporting of loss of control incidents. [Details and sources](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/california/) - In force **SB 53** Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act (SB 53, Chapter 138, Statutes of 2025) · next step Jan 1, 2027 - Passed, not yet in force **SB 813** SB 813, Independent verification organizations (Chapter 179, Statutes of 2026) · next step May 1, 2027 - In force **EO N-9-26** Executive Order N-9-26 · next step Nov 16, 2026 State · 1 measure ### [New York](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/new-york/) New York enacted the RAISE Act on December 19, 2025 and rewrote it through chapter amendments signed March 27, 2026, aligning it closely with California's SB 53. It takes effect January 1, 2027, with a new oversight office inside the Department of Financial Services and a 72 hour incident reporting window, shorter than California's 15 days. [Details and sources](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/new-york/) - Passed, not yet in force **RAISE Act** Responsible AI Safety and Education Act (RAISE Act), S6953B/A6453B as amended by S8828/A9449 · next step Jan 1, 2027 State · 1 measure ### [Illinois](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/illinois/) Illinois enacted the Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act (SB 315) on July 6, 2026, the third state frontier SI statute and the first to require regular independent third party safety audits. Its provisions begin January 1, 2027, with framework and audit duties starting January 1, 2028. [Details and sources](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/illinois/) - Passed, not yet in force **SB 315** Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act (SB 315) · next step Jan 1, 2027 State · 2 measures ### [Colorado](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/colorado/) Colorado's 2024 AI Act was a broad algorithmic discrimination law rather than a frontier SI safety law. Its start was delayed to June 30, 2026, enforcement was paused by a stipulated order in a federal suit brought by xAI and joined by the US government, and the state repealed and replaced it with SB 26-189, a narrower disclosure law for automated decision technology effective January 1, 2027. [Details and sources](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/colorado/) - Stalled or withdrawn **SB 24-205** Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (SB 24-205) - Passed, not yet in force **SB 26-189** SB 26-189 (repeal and reenactment of the Colorado AI Act) · next step Jan 1, 2027 State · 1 measure ### [Texas](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/texas/) The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act took effect January 1, 2026. It bans a narrow set of intentionally harmful SI uses and creates a regulatory sandbox and an Artificial Intelligence Council, but it imposes no frontier model testing or incident reporting duties. [Details and sources](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/texas/) - In force **TRAIGA** Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (HB 149) Upcoming dates ## 10 dates to watch The next step for each measure: deadlines, laws taking effect and reports due. Dates in the next 30 days are marked in amber. 1. Nov 16, 2026 [California · EO N-9-26](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/california/) Government Operations Agency recommendations due on onsite audits, a frontier model kill switch and loss of control incident reporting in 8 days 2. Nov 28, 2026 [United States · EO 14434](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/us/) Assistant to the President for Science and Technology must submit proposed legislative language defining Super Intelligence (60 days after signing) in 20 days 3. Dec 2, 2026 [European Union · AI Omnibus](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/european-union/) Generative systems already on the market must meet the Article 50(2) marking duty, and added Article 5 provisions apply in 24 days 4. Jan 1, 2027 [California · SB 53](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/california/) First annual Cal OES report on critical safety incidents, Attorney General whistleblower report and Department of Technology review of frontier definitions due in 54 days 5. Jan 1, 2027 [Colorado · SB 26-189](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/colorado/) Law takes effect; Attorney General rules on consumer disclosures due the same day in 54 days 6. Jan 1, 2027 [Illinois · SB 315](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/illinois/) Act takes effect; framework and annual audit duties follow on January 1, 2028 in 54 days 7. Jan 1, 2027 [New York · RAISE Act](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/new-york/) Law takes effect and the Department of Financial Services office begins oversight in 54 days 8. Jan 22, 2027 [South Korea · AI Basic Act](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/south-korea/) End of the one year grace period on administrative fines indicated by the Ministry of Science and ICT (policy, not statute) in 75 days 9. May 1, 2027 [California · SB 813](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/california/) Executive Order N-9-26 target for posting criteria for independent verification organizations (statutory deadline January 1, 2028) in 174 days 10. Aug 2, 2027 [European Union · EU AI Act (GPAI)](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/european-union/) Deadline for general purpose SI models placed on the market before August 2, 2025 to comply in 267 days International and voluntary ## Treaties, summits and pledges Measures that cross borders: the first binding treaty, UN bodies, G7 and summit commitments, the US and China dialogue and the civil society call on superintelligence. International · 1 measure ### [Council of Europe](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/council-of-europe/) The Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence is the first legally binding international treaty in this field, covering human rights, democracy and the rule of law across the SI lifecycle. It opened for signature on September 5, 2024 and the EU ratified it on May 15, 2026, but it needs five ratifications including three Council of Europe member states, and reports that it is already in force could not be confirmed against the official treaty record. [Details and sources](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/council-of-europe/) - Passed, not yet in force **CETS 225** Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (CETS No. 225) International · 2 measures ### [United Nations](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/united-nations/) In August 2025 the UN General Assembly created an Independent International Scientific Panel on AI and a Global Dialogue on AI Governance. The 40 member panel, co-chaired by Yoshua Bengio and Maria Ressa, released its preliminary report on July 1, 2026, and the first Dialogue met in Geneva on July 6 and 7, 2026, with the next session planned for New York in 2027. [Details and sources](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/united-nations/) - Voluntary or guidance **UN Scientific Panel** Independent International Scientific Panel on AI - Voluntary or guidance **Global Dialogue** Global Dialogue on AI Governance International · 1 measure ### [G7](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/g7/) The G7 Hiroshima AI Process produced the International Code of Conduct for Organizations Developing Advanced AI Systems in 2023. Adherence is voluntary and tracked through an OECD reporting framework launched February 7, 2025; version 2.0 launched May 28, 2026, and reports from 31 companies were published October 2, 2026. [Details and sources](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/g7/) - Voluntary or guidance **Hiroshima Code of Conduct** Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct for Organizations Developing Advanced AI Systems International · 4 measures ### [International summit series](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/international-summits/) A series of intergovernmental summits produced the main political statements on frontier SI risk. The 2023 Bletchley Declaration recognized potential catastrophic harm, the 2024 Seoul summit secured company commitments to publish safety frameworks with risk thresholds, and the February 2026 New Delhi summit's declaration, endorsed by 92 countries and organizations including the US and China, relied on voluntary measures for secure and trusted SI. [Details and sources](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/international-summits/) - Voluntary or guidance **Bletchley Declaration** The Bletchley Declaration by Countries Attending the AI Safety Summit, 1-2 November 2023 - Voluntary or guidance **Seoul Commitments** Frontier AI Safety Commitments, AI Seoul Summit 2024 - Voluntary or guidance **New Delhi Declaration** New Delhi Declaration on AI Impact - Voluntary or guidance **New Delhi Commitments** New Delhi Frontier AI Commitments International · 1 measure ### [United States and China (bilateral)](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/us-china/) After their Washington summit of September 23 to 25, 2026, the US and Chinese governments agreed to an SI dialogue, which the US calls the US-China Super Intelligence Dialogue, and a bilateral channel for SI incidents. Neither side has published a signed text or defined an incident, and the next exchange was described as due in November 2026. [Details and sources](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/us-china/) - Voluntary or guidance **US-China SI Dialogue** U.S.-China Super Intelligence (SI) Dialogue and AI incident communication channel International · 1 measure ### [Global civil society](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/global-civil-society/) The Statement on Superintelligence, organized by the Future of Life Institute and released October 22, 2025, is a public call rather than a government commitment. It asks for a prohibition on developing superintelligence until there is broad scientific consensus it can be done safely and controllably and strong public buy-in, and its site showed more than 78,000 signatures when checked in November 2026. [Details and sources](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/global-civil-society/) - Voluntary or guidance **FLI Statement** Statement on Superintelligence Lab safety policies ## What the labs promise themselves The published frontier safety frameworks of 8 leading labs, with their latest version. These are self imposed and can change at any time. | Lab | Policy | Version | Updated | What it says now | |---|---|---|---|---| | Anthropic | [Responsible Scaling Policy](https://www.anthropic.com/responsible-scaling-policy) | 3.4 | Jul 8, 2026 | Version 3.0 (February 24, 2026) rewrote the policy around a public Frontier Safety Roadmap and periodic Risk Reports, specified mitigations only for the next capability level, and dropped the earlier implied pause commitment. Later versions let the Long-Term Benefit Trust request external review of Risk Reports and revised the automated R&D threshold. | | OpenAI | [Preparedness Framework](https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/18a02b5d-6b67-4cec-ab64-68cdfbddebcd/preparedness-framework-v2.pdf) | 2 | Apr 15, 2025 | Tracks biological and chemical, cybersecurity and SI self-improvement capabilities against High and Critical thresholds, with a Safety Advisory Group advising leadership. OpenAI announced a full rewrite on August 18, 2026 after judging a model may have reached the Critical cyber threshold; no replacement version had been located as of this update. | | OpenAI | [Frontier Governance Framework](https://openai.com/index/openai-frontier-governance-framework) | May 2026 | May 28, 2026 | Maps OpenAI's safety and security practices to California's frontier transparency law and the EU General-Purpose AI Code of Practice, covering cyber offense, CBRN, harmful manipulation and loss of control. It sits alongside the Preparedness Framework and does not replace it. | | Google DeepMind | [Frontier Safety Framework](https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/DeepMind.com/Blog/strengthening-our-frontier-safety-framework/frontier-safety-framework_3-1.pdf) | 3.1 | Apr 17, 2026 | Sets Critical Capability Levels for CBRN, cyber, harmful manipulation and ML R&D, and adds Tracked Capability Levels, including one for stealth and situational awareness tied to misalignment. Reaching a Critical Capability Level requires a safety case and governance approval before external or high-risk internal deployment. | | Meta | [Superintelligence Scaling Framework](https://research.meta.ai/static/meta-superintelligence-scaling-framework) | 2.1 | Oct 2, 2026 | The October 2026 revision of the framework previously titled the Frontier AI Framework sets Critical, High and Moderate risk levels across cybersecurity, chemical and biological, and loss of control outcomes. High risk models deploy only with mitigations that bring risk to moderate, and development past Critical continues only when catastrophic risks are judged acceptable. | | xAI | [Frontier Artificial Intelligence Framework](https://media.x.ai/v1/website/xai-frontier-artificial-intelligence-framework-30-june-2026-99c40684.pdf) | June 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 | Commits xAI to at least annual systemic risk assessments covering CBRN, offensive cyber, loss of control and harmful manipulation, with release only when risks are judged acceptable. It also sets security controls for model weights and an incident response process that can include shutting systems down. | | Microsoft | [Frontier Governance Framework](https://cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com/is/content/microsoftcorp/microsoft/msc/documents/presentations/CSR/Frontier-Governance-Framework-Feb-2026.pdf) | February 2026 | n/a | Screens Microsoft's most advanced models for CBRN, offensive cyber, advanced autonomy, loss of control and harmful manipulation capabilities, rescreening at least every six months. Risks must be brought to low or medium before deployment, or development and deployment pause. | | Amazon | [Frontier Model Safety Framework](https://cdn.amazon.science/a0/4f/bca5cb32495280835d9370a466b7/amazon-fmsf-9-2026.pdf) | September 2026 | Sep 17, 2026 | Sets Critical Capability Thresholds for CBRN weapons proliferation, offensive cyber operations and loss of control, and commits Amazon not to deploy a model that meets a threshold until safeguards bring risk to acceptable levels. This is the reviewed update of the first 2025 version. | Every measure ## All 43 measures in one table The full list, readable without the map. The status filter above applies here too. Each jurisdiction has its own page with scope, requirements, penalties and sources. | Jurisdiction | Measure | Status | Signed | Effective | Next date | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | [European Union](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/european-union/) | EU AI Act (GPAI) | In force | Jun 13, 2024 | Aug 2, 2025 | Aug 2, 2027 | | [European Union](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/european-union/) | GPAI Code of Practice (Safety and Security) | Voluntary or guidance | Jul 10, 2025 | Aug 2, 2025 | n/a | | [European Union](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/european-union/) | AI Omnibus | In force | Jul 8, 2026 | Jul 27, 2026 | Dec 2, 2026 | | [United States (federal)](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/us/) | EO 14434 | In force | Sep 29, 2026 | Sep 29, 2026 | Nov 28, 2026 | | [United States (federal)](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/us/) | EO 14365 | In force | Dec 11, 2025 | Dec 11, 2025 | n/a | | [United States (federal)](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/us/) | AI Action Plan | Voluntary or guidance | Jul 23, 2025 | n/a | n/a | | [United States (federal)](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/us/) | National Policy Framework | Voluntary or guidance | Mar 20, 2026 | n/a | n/a | | [United States (federal)](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/us/) | CAISSI | Voluntary or guidance | n/a | n/a | n/a | | [United States (federal)](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/us/) | FRONTIER Act | Proposed | n/a | n/a | n/a | | [California](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/california/) | SB 53 | In force | Sep 29, 2025 | Jan 1, 2026 | Jan 1, 2027 | | [California](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/california/) | SB 813 | Passed, not yet in force | Sep 9, 2026 | Jan 1, 2027 | May 1, 2027 | | [California](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/california/) | EO N-9-26 | In force | Sep 18, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 | Nov 16, 2026 | | [New York](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/new-york/) | RAISE Act | Passed, not yet in force | Dec 19, 2025 | Jan 1, 2027 | Jan 1, 2027 | | [Illinois](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/illinois/) | SB 315 | Passed, not yet in force | Jul 6, 2026 | Jan 1, 2027 | Jan 1, 2027 | | [Colorado](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/colorado/) | SB 24-205 | Stalled or withdrawn | n/a | n/a | n/a | | [Colorado](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/colorado/) | SB 26-189 | Passed, not yet in force | May 14, 2026 | Jan 1, 2027 | Jan 1, 2027 | | [Texas](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/texas/) | TRAIGA | In force | Jun 22, 2025 | Jan 1, 2026 | n/a | | [China](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/china/) | Generative AI Measures | In force | Jul 10, 2023 | Aug 15, 2023 | n/a | | [China](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/china/) | Labeling Measures | In force | Mar 14, 2025 | Sep 1, 2025 | n/a | | [China](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/china/) | Cybersecurity Law SI clause | In force | Oct 28, 2025 | Jan 1, 2026 | n/a | | [China](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/china/) | Framework 3.0 | Voluntary or guidance | Sep 14, 2026 | n/a | n/a | | [United Kingdom](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/united-kingdom/) | UK AISI | Voluntary or guidance | Feb 14, 2025 | Feb 14, 2025 | n/a | | [United Kingdom](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/united-kingdom/) | UK frontier bill | Stalled or withdrawn | n/a | n/a | n/a | | [Japan](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/japan/) | AI Promotion Act | In force | n/a | Jun 4, 2025 | n/a | | [South Korea](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/south-korea/) | AI Basic Act | In force | Jan 21, 2025 | Jan 22, 2026 | Jan 22, 2027 | | [Canada](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/canada/) | AIDA | Stalled or withdrawn | n/a | n/a | n/a | | [Canada](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/canada/) | Voluntary Code | Voluntary or guidance | Sep 27, 2023 | Sep 27, 2023 | n/a | | [Brazil](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/brazil/) | PL 2338/2023 | Proposed | n/a | n/a | n/a | | [India](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/india/) | AI Governance Guidelines | Voluntary or guidance | Nov 5, 2025 | n/a | n/a | | [Australia](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/australia/) | National AI Plan | Voluntary or guidance | Dec 2, 2025 | n/a | n/a | | [Australia](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/australia/) | AU AISI | Voluntary or guidance | Nov 25, 2025 | n/a | n/a | | [Australia](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/australia/) | Australian Standards for AI | Proposed | n/a | n/a | n/a | | [Singapore](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/singapore/) | Singapore Consensus | Voluntary or guidance | n/a | n/a | n/a | | [Council of Europe](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/council-of-europe/) | CETS 225 | Passed, not yet in force | Sep 5, 2024 | n/a | n/a | | [United Nations](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/united-nations/) | UN Scientific Panel | Voluntary or guidance | Aug 26, 2025 | Feb 12, 2026 | n/a | | [United Nations](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/united-nations/) | Global Dialogue | Voluntary or guidance | Aug 26, 2025 | Jul 6, 2026 | n/a | | [G7](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/g7/) | Hiroshima Code of Conduct | Voluntary or guidance | n/a | n/a | n/a | | [International summit series](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/international-summits/) | Bletchley Declaration | Voluntary or guidance | Nov 1, 2023 | n/a | n/a | | [International summit series](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/international-summits/) | Seoul Commitments | Voluntary or guidance | May 21, 2024 | n/a | n/a | | [International summit series](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/international-summits/) | New Delhi Declaration | Voluntary or guidance | n/a | n/a | n/a | | [International summit series](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/international-summits/) | New Delhi Commitments | Voluntary or guidance | Feb 19, 2026 | n/a | n/a | | [United States and China (bilateral)](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/us-china/) | US-China SI Dialogue | Voluntary or guidance | Sep 25, 2026 | n/a | n/a | | [Global civil society](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/global-civil-society/) | FLI Statement | Voluntary or guidance | Oct 22, 2025 | n/a | n/a | Use the data ## Cite it, download it Every measure, status, date and source as CSV or JSON. Statuses are checked against official texts and reputable legal trackers. How statuses are set ### The method **In force** means binding and applying now. **Passed** means enacted but not yet applying. **Voluntary** covers guidance, codes and pledges with no legal force. **Proposed** means formally introduced. **Stalled** means withdrawn, paused or dead in its last session. The map covers measures aimed at the safety of advanced and frontier SI. General privacy, copyright and consumer laws are left out. Nothing here is legal advice. Cite the Control Map The Control Map: SI safety laws and rules worldwide. enterrsi.si, updated November 8, 2026. 43 measures in 22 jurisdictions. https://enterrsi.si/control-map/ Free to cite and reuse under CC BY 4.0 with a link to enterrsi.si/control-map/. [Download CSV](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/control-map.csv) [Download JSON](https://enterrsi.si/control-map/control-map.json) Enter RSI ## Control is one input of the RSI Clock The control gap from this map is one of five inputs behind the minutes to rogue SI. [Open the RSI Clock](https://enterrsi.si/clock/) [Incident Database](https://enterrsi.si/incidents/)