{
 "name": "The Promise Tracker",
 "publisher": "enterrsi.si",
 "url": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/",
 "license": "CC BY 4.0",
 "license_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
 "checked": "2026-11-10",
 "statuses": {
  "kept": "A reputable public source reports the promise fulfilled. The source is linked and named, with its date.",
  "not-met": "A reputable public source reports that the promise was not fulfilled, or that a deadline passed without it.",
  "withdrawn": "The promise was removed or replaced by the one who made it, as a reputable public source reports.",
  "in-progress": "The promise is ongoing or not yet due, and public records show work toward it.",
  "no-evidence": "No public, reputable source shows the promise kept or broken. This is the cautious default."
 },
 "count": 47,
 "promises": [
  {
   "id": "mistral-large-4-red-team",
   "lab": "mistral",
   "date": "2026-10-06",
   "who": "Mistral AI, announcing Mistral Large 4",
   "text": "Red-team the model with cybersecurity leaders, partners and state authorities before releasing its weights.",
   "quote": "we are red-teaming the model in real-world settings with cybersecurity leaders, vetted partners, and state authorities",
   "topic": "testing",
   "source": {
    "title": "Introducing Mistral Large 4",
    "publisher": "Mistral AI",
    "url": "https://mistral.ai/news/mistral-large-4/",
    "date": "2026-10-06"
   },
   "status": "no-evidence",
   "note": "No evaluator, method or result has been published; the weights were released on Oct 29, 2026.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Mistral",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/mistral/#mistral-large-4-red-team"
  },
  {
   "id": "meta-ssf-deploy",
   "lab": "meta",
   "date": "2026-10-02",
   "who": "Meta, Superintelligence Scaling Framework 2.1",
   "text": "Not release a high-risk model externally without strong evidence that mitigations bring the risk down.",
   "quote": "we will not deploy the model externally unless we have strong additional evidence",
   "topic": "pause",
   "source": {
    "title": "Meta Superintelligence Scaling Framework, Version 2.1",
    "publisher": "Meta",
    "url": "https://research.meta.ai/static/meta-superintelligence-scaling-framework",
    "date": "2026-10-02"
   },
   "status": "in-progress",
   "note": "The framework took effect in October 2026; Meta has not published an outside audit of it.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Meta",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/meta/#meta-ssf-deploy"
  },
  {
   "id": "amazon-fmsf-deploy",
   "lab": "amazon",
   "date": "2026-09-17",
   "who": "Amazon, Frontier Model Safety Framework",
   "text": "Not deploy a model that meets a Critical Capability Threshold until safeguards mitigate the risk.",
   "quote": "we will not deploy the model until safeguards appropriately mitigate the risks.",
   "topic": "pause",
   "source": {
    "title": "Amazon's Frontier Model Safety Framework (September 2026)",
    "publisher": "Amazon",
    "url": "https://cdn.amazon.science/a0/4f/bca5cb32495280835d9370a466b7/amazon-fmsf-9-2026.pdf",
    "date": "2026-09-17"
   },
   "status": "in-progress",
   "note": "METR concluded that Nova 2.0 Lite does not cross the automated research Critical Capability Threshold.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [
    {
     "title": "Strengthening AI safety evaluation through independent third-party review",
     "publisher": "Amazon Science",
     "url": "https://www.amazon.science/blog/strengthening-ai-safety-evaluation-through-independent-third-party-review",
     "date": "2026-10-20"
    }
   ],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Amazon",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/amazon/#amazon-fmsf-deploy"
  },
  {
   "id": "amazon-fmsf-reports",
   "lab": "amazon",
   "date": "2026-09-17",
   "who": "Amazon, Frontier Model Safety Framework",
   "text": "Publish safety evaluation reports for its most capable frontier models.",
   "quote": "we publish safety evaluation reports for our most capable frontier models",
   "topic": "disclosure",
   "source": {
    "title": "Amazon's Frontier Model Safety Framework (September 2026)",
    "publisher": "Amazon",
    "url": "https://cdn.amazon.science/a0/4f/bca5cb32495280835d9370a466b7/amazon-fmsf-9-2026.pdf",
    "date": "2026-09-17"
   },
   "status": "in-progress",
   "note": "An evaluation report for Nova 2.0 Lite was posted to arXiv by Amazon authors on Jan 27, 2026.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [
    {
     "title": "Evaluating Nova 2.0 Lite model under Amazon's Frontier Model Safety Framework",
     "publisher": "arXiv (Amazon authors)",
     "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19134",
     "date": "2026-01-27"
    }
   ],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Amazon",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/amazon/#amazon-fmsf-reports"
  },
  {
   "id": "anthropic-rsp-risk-reports",
   "lab": "anthropic",
   "date": "2026-07-08",
   "who": "Anthropic, Responsible Scaling Policy 3.4",
   "text": "Publish Risk Reports on its deployed models, and let outside reviewers check them when the Long-Term Benefit Trust asks.",
   "quote": null,
   "topic": "disclosure",
   "source": {
    "title": "Anthropic's Responsible Scaling Policy",
    "publisher": "Anthropic",
    "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/responsible-scaling-policy",
    "date": "2026-07-08"
   },
   "status": "in-progress",
   "note": "Version 3.4 took effect on Jul 8, 2026; no outside review of a Risk Report has been published yet.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Anthropic",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/anthropic/#anthropic-rsp-risk-reports"
  },
  {
   "id": "xai-framework-incident-reports",
   "lab": "xai",
   "date": "2026-06-30",
   "who": "xAI, Frontier Artificial Intelligence Framework",
   "text": "Send authorities a copy of incident reports.",
   "quote": "will provide the relevant authorities with a copy of the incident report",
   "topic": "disclosure",
   "source": {
    "title": "xAI Frontier Artificial Intelligence Framework",
    "publisher": "xAI",
    "url": "https://media.x.ai/v1/website/xai-frontier-artificial-intelligence-framework-30-june-2026-f1f0c916.pdf",
    "date": "2026-06-30"
   },
   "status": "no-evidence",
   "note": "FLI found no misuse or misalignment transparency reports from xAI (Jul 14, 2026).",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "xAI",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/xai/#xai-framework-incident-reports"
  },
  {
   "id": "google-deepmind-fsf-safety-case",
   "lab": "google-deepmind",
   "date": "2026-04-17",
   "who": "Google DeepMind, Frontier Safety Framework 3.1",
   "text": "Back any model that reaches a Critical Capability Level with a safety case before deployment.",
   "quote": "Where the model has reached a CCL, the residual risk assessment will be supplemented with a safety case.",
   "topic": "pause",
   "source": {
    "title": "Frontier Safety Framework, Version 3.1",
    "publisher": "Google DeepMind",
    "url": "https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/DeepMind.com/Blog/strengthening-our-frontier-safety-framework/frontier-safety-framework_3-1.pdf",
    "date": "2026-04-17"
   },
   "status": "in-progress",
   "note": "Google's Gemini 4 Argon safety report (Oct 13, 2026) says it cannot rule out the cybersecurity Critical Capability Level; no safety case has been published.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [
    {
     "title": "Gemini 4 Argon Safety and Security Report",
     "publisher": "Google DeepMind",
     "url": "https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/gemini/gemini_4_safety_report.pdf",
     "date": "2026-10-13"
    }
   ],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Google DeepMind",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/google-deepmind/#google-deepmind-fsf-safety-case"
  },
  {
   "id": "microsoft-fgf-pause",
   "lab": "microsoft",
   "date": "2026-02-13",
   "who": "Microsoft, Frontier Governance Framework",
   "text": "Pause development and deployment of a model whose risk it cannot sufficiently mitigate.",
   "quote": "we will pause development and deployment until the point at which mitigation practices evolve to meet the risk",
   "topic": "pause",
   "source": {
    "title": "Frontier Governance Framework (February 2026)",
    "publisher": "Microsoft",
    "url": "https://cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com/is/content/microsoftcorp/microsoft/msc/documents/presentations/CSR/Frontier-Governance-Framework-Feb-2026.pdf",
    "date": "2026-02-13"
   },
   "status": "in-progress",
   "note": "No public record of a pause has been reported.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Microsoft",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/microsoft/#microsoft-fgf-pause"
  },
  {
   "id": "microsoft-fgf-share-evals",
   "lab": "microsoft",
   "date": "2026-02-13",
   "who": "Microsoft, Frontier Governance Framework",
   "text": "Publish each covered model's evaluations and its risk classification.",
   "quote": "relevant evaluations, and the model's risk classification will be shared publicly",
   "topic": "disclosure",
   "source": {
    "title": "Frontier Governance Framework (February 2026)",
    "publisher": "Microsoft",
    "url": "https://cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com/is/content/microsoftcorp/microsoft/msc/documents/presentations/CSR/Frontier-Governance-Framework-Feb-2026.pdf",
    "date": "2026-02-13"
   },
   "status": "no-evidence",
   "note": "The MAI-Thinking-1 technical report (Jun 2, 2026) gives safety benchmark results but no frontier risk classification.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [
    {
     "title": "MAI-Thinking-1: Building a Hill-Climbing Machine",
     "publisher": "Microsoft AI",
     "url": "https://microsoft.ai/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/main_20260602_2.pdf",
     "date": "2026-06-02"
    }
   ],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Microsoft",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/microsoft/#microsoft-fgf-share-evals"
  },
  {
   "id": "microsoft-humanist-superintelligence",
   "lab": "microsoft",
   "date": "2025-11-06",
   "who": "Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of Microsoft AI",
   "text": "Build superintelligence only within limits that keep humans in control.",
   "quote": "we are not building a superintelligence at any cost, with no limits",
   "topic": "other",
   "source": {
    "title": "Towards Humanist Superintelligence",
    "publisher": "Microsoft AI",
    "url": "https://microsoft.ai/blog/towards-humanist-superintelligence",
    "date": "2025-11-06"
   },
   "status": "in-progress",
   "note": "Microsoft's Frontier Governance Framework (Feb 2026) puts limits in writing, including a pause commitment.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Microsoft",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/microsoft/#microsoft-humanist-superintelligence"
  },
  {
   "id": "amazon-eu-code-2025",
   "lab": "amazon",
   "date": "2025-08-01",
   "who": "Amazon, a signatory of the EU Code of Practice",
   "text": "Follow the Safety and Security chapter of the EU General-Purpose AI Code of Practice for its most capable models.",
   "quote": null,
   "topic": "framework",
   "source": {
    "title": "The General-Purpose AI Code of Practice: signatories",
    "publisher": "European Commission",
    "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/contents-code-gpai",
    "date": "2026-10-07"
   },
   "status": "in-progress",
   "note": "The European Commission lists the signature (page updated Oct 7, 2026); the EU AI Office has not published an assessment of compliance.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Amazon",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/amazon/#amazon-eu-code-2025"
  },
  {
   "id": "anthropic-eu-code-2025",
   "lab": "anthropic",
   "date": "2025-08-01",
   "who": "Anthropic, a signatory of the EU Code of Practice",
   "text": "Follow the Safety and Security chapter of the EU General-Purpose AI Code of Practice for its most capable models.",
   "quote": null,
   "topic": "framework",
   "source": {
    "title": "The General-Purpose AI Code of Practice: signatories",
    "publisher": "European Commission",
    "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/contents-code-gpai",
    "date": "2026-10-07"
   },
   "status": "in-progress",
   "note": "The European Commission lists the signature (page updated Oct 7, 2026); the EU AI Office has not published an assessment of compliance.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Anthropic",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/anthropic/#anthropic-eu-code-2025"
  },
  {
   "id": "google-deepmind-eu-code-2025",
   "lab": "google-deepmind",
   "date": "2025-08-01",
   "who": "Google, a signatory of the EU Code of Practice",
   "text": "Follow the Safety and Security chapter of the EU General-Purpose AI Code of Practice for its most capable models.",
   "quote": null,
   "topic": "framework",
   "source": {
    "title": "The General-Purpose AI Code of Practice: signatories",
    "publisher": "European Commission",
    "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/contents-code-gpai",
    "date": "2026-10-07"
   },
   "status": "in-progress",
   "note": "The European Commission lists the signature (page updated Oct 7, 2026); the EU AI Office has not published an assessment of compliance.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Google DeepMind",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/google-deepmind/#google-deepmind-eu-code-2025"
  },
  {
   "id": "microsoft-eu-code-2025",
   "lab": "microsoft",
   "date": "2025-08-01",
   "who": "Microsoft, a signatory of the EU Code of Practice",
   "text": "Follow the Safety and Security chapter of the EU General-Purpose AI Code of Practice for its most capable models.",
   "quote": null,
   "topic": "framework",
   "source": {
    "title": "The General-Purpose AI Code of Practice: signatories",
    "publisher": "European Commission",
    "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/contents-code-gpai",
    "date": "2026-10-07"
   },
   "status": "in-progress",
   "note": "The European Commission lists the signature (page updated Oct 7, 2026); the EU AI Office has not published an assessment of compliance.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Microsoft",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/microsoft/#microsoft-eu-code-2025"
  },
  {
   "id": "mistral-eu-code-2025",
   "lab": "mistral",
   "date": "2025-08-01",
   "who": "Mistral AI, a signatory of the EU Code of Practice",
   "text": "Follow the Safety and Security chapter of the EU General-Purpose AI Code of Practice for its most capable models.",
   "quote": null,
   "topic": "framework",
   "source": {
    "title": "The General-Purpose AI Code of Practice: signatories",
    "publisher": "European Commission",
    "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/contents-code-gpai",
    "date": "2026-10-07"
   },
   "status": "in-progress",
   "note": "The European Commission lists the signature (page updated Oct 7, 2026); the EU AI Office has not published an assessment of compliance.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Mistral",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/mistral/#mistral-eu-code-2025"
  },
  {
   "id": "openai-eu-code-2025",
   "lab": "openai",
   "date": "2025-08-01",
   "who": "OpenAI, a signatory of the EU Code of Practice",
   "text": "Follow the Safety and Security chapter of the EU General-Purpose AI Code of Practice for its most capable models.",
   "quote": null,
   "topic": "framework",
   "source": {
    "title": "The General-Purpose AI Code of Practice: signatories",
    "publisher": "European Commission",
    "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/contents-code-gpai",
    "date": "2026-10-07"
   },
   "status": "in-progress",
   "note": "The European Commission lists the signature (page updated Oct 7, 2026); the EU AI Office has not published an assessment of compliance.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "OpenAI",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/openai/#openai-eu-code-2025"
  },
  {
   "id": "xai-eu-code-2025",
   "lab": "xai",
   "date": "2025-08-01",
   "who": "xAI, a signatory of the EU Code of Practice",
   "text": "Follow the Safety and Security chapter of the EU General-Purpose AI Code of Practice for its most capable models.",
   "quote": null,
   "topic": "framework",
   "source": {
    "title": "The General-Purpose AI Code of Practice: signatories",
    "publisher": "European Commission",
    "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/contents-code-gpai",
    "date": "2026-10-07"
   },
   "status": "in-progress",
   "note": "The European Commission lists the signature (page updated Oct 7, 2026); the EU AI Office has not published an assessment of compliance. xAI signed the Safety and Security chapter only.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "xAI",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/xai/#xai-eu-code-2025"
  },
  {
   "id": "meta-personal-superintelligence",
   "lab": "meta",
   "date": "2025-07-30",
   "who": "Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta",
   "text": "Be rigorous about superintelligence risks and careful about what Meta open sources.",
   "quote": "We'll need to be rigorous about mitigating these risks and careful about what we choose to open source.",
   "topic": "other",
   "source": {
    "title": "Personal Superintelligence",
    "publisher": "Meta",
    "url": "https://www.meta.com/superintelligence/",
    "date": "2025-07-30"
   },
   "status": "no-evidence",
   "note": "No public, reputable assessment of this pledge was found.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Meta",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/meta/#meta-personal-superintelligence"
  },
  {
   "id": "openai-preparedness-halt",
   "lab": "openai",
   "date": "2025-04-15",
   "who": "OpenAI, Preparedness Framework version 2",
   "text": "Stop developing a model that reaches a Critical capability until matching safeguards exist.",
   "quote": "Until we have specified safeguards and security controls that would meet a Critical standard, halt further development",
   "topic": "pause",
   "source": {
    "title": "Preparedness Framework, Version 2",
    "publisher": "OpenAI",
    "url": "https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/18a02b5d-6b67-4cec-ab64-68cdfbddebcd/preparedness-framework-v2.pdf",
    "date": "2025-04-15"
   },
   "status": "in-progress",
   "note": "OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra System Card (Sep 3, 2026) rates the model Critical in cybersecurity. FLI reported on Jul 14, 2026 that OpenAI has rolled back commitments through its updated framework.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [
    {
     "title": "GPT-6 Astra System Card",
     "publisher": "OpenAI",
     "url": "https://deploymentsafety.openai.com/gpt-6-astra",
     "date": "2026-09-03"
    }
   ],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "OpenAI",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/openai/#openai-preparedness-halt"
  },
  {
   "id": "xai-revised-framework-three-months",
   "lab": "xai",
   "date": "2025-02-10",
   "who": "xAI, in its draft Risk Management Framework",
   "text": "Publish a revised safety framework within three months of the February 2025 draft.",
   "quote": "We plan to release an updated version of this policy within three months.",
   "topic": "framework",
   "source": {
    "title": "xAI Risk Management Framework (Draft)",
    "publisher": "xAI",
    "url": "https://x.ai/documents/2025.02.10-RMF-Draft.pdf",
    "date": "2025-02-10"
   },
   "status": "not-met",
   "note": "reported by TechCrunch on May 13, 2025: the May 10 deadline \"came and went without acknowledgement on xAI's official channels.\" METR lists the first full version from August 2025.",
   "status_source": {
    "title": "xAI's promised safety report is MIA",
    "publisher": "TechCrunch",
    "url": "https://techcrunch.com/2025/05/13/xais-promised-safety-report-is-mia/",
    "date": "2025-05-13"
   },
   "extra_sources": [
    {
     "title": "Frontier AI Safety Policies (index of published company frameworks)",
     "publisher": "METR",
     "url": "https://metr.org/fsp",
     "date": "2026-11-10"
    }
   ],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "xAI",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/xai/#xai-revised-framework-three-months"
  },
  {
   "id": "meta-frontier-framework-stop",
   "lab": "meta",
   "date": "2025-02-03",
   "who": "Meta, Frontier AI Framework",
   "text": "Stop developing a model that reaches the critical risk threshold if the risk cannot be mitigated.",
   "quote": "If a frontier AI is assessed to have reached the critical risk threshold and cannot be mitigated, we will stop development",
   "topic": "pause",
   "source": {
    "title": "Frontier AI Framework",
    "publisher": "Meta",
    "url": "https://ai.meta.com/static-resource/meta-frontier-ai-framework",
    "date": "2025-02-03"
   },
   "status": "withdrawn",
   "note": "reported by the Future of Life Institute on Jul 14, 2026: Meta \"has also backslided on pause commitments\". Its April 2026 revision changed the Critical response from Stop to Develop with Mitigations.",
   "status_source": {
    "title": "AI Safety Index, Summer 2026 (full report)",
    "publisher": "Future of Life Institute",
    "url": "https://futureoflife.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/AI-Safety-Index-Summer-2026-Digital-14-Jul.pdf",
    "date": "2026-07-14"
   },
   "extra_sources": [
    {
     "title": "Meta Superintelligence Scaling Framework, Version 2.1",
     "publisher": "Meta",
     "url": "https://research.meta.ai/static/meta-superintelligence-scaling-framework",
     "date": "2026-10-02"
    }
   ],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Meta",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/meta/#meta-frontier-framework-stop"
  },
  {
   "id": "alibaba-china-2024-disclosure",
   "lab": "alibaba",
   "date": "2024-12-01",
   "who": "Alibaba, a signatory of China's AI Safety Commitments",
   "text": "Publicly disclose its safety and security governance measures.",
   "quote": "Proactively disclose safety and security governance measures",
   "topic": "disclosure",
   "source": {
    "title": "Artificial Intelligence Safety Commitments",
    "publisher": "China AI Industry Alliance (AIIA) and CAICT",
    "url": "https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/s-XFKQCWhu0uye4opgb3Ng",
    "date": "2024-12-01"
   },
   "status": "no-evidence",
   "note": "FLI reported on Jul 14, 2026 that the company has no published safety framework.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [
    {
     "title": "Artificial Intelligence Safety Commitments (China AI Industry Alliance), text and signatories",
     "publisher": "AGORA, Emerging Technology Observatory",
     "url": "https://agora.eto.tech/instrument/1831",
     "date": "2024-12-01"
    }
   ],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Alibaba (Qwen)",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/alibaba/#alibaba-china-2024-disclosure"
  },
  {
   "id": "alibaba-china-2024-testing",
   "lab": "alibaba",
   "date": "2024-12-01",
   "who": "Alibaba, a signatory of China's AI Safety Commitments",
   "text": "Red-team and rigorously test models before each release or update.",
   "quote": "Through dedicated simulation and red-teaming experts to rigorously test AI models prior to their release or update",
   "topic": "testing",
   "source": {
    "title": "Artificial Intelligence Safety Commitments",
    "publisher": "China AI Industry Alliance (AIIA) and CAICT",
    "url": "https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/s-XFKQCWhu0uye4opgb3Ng",
    "date": "2024-12-01"
   },
   "status": "no-evidence",
   "note": "FLI reported on Jul 14, 2026 that it found no public mention of outside pre-release testing.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [
    {
     "title": "Artificial Intelligence Safety Commitments (China AI Industry Alliance), text and signatories",
     "publisher": "AGORA, Emerging Technology Observatory",
     "url": "https://agora.eto.tech/instrument/1831",
     "date": "2024-12-01"
    }
   ],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Alibaba (Qwen)",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/alibaba/#alibaba-china-2024-testing"
  },
  {
   "id": "deepseek-china-2024-disclosure",
   "lab": "deepseek",
   "date": "2024-12-01",
   "who": "DeepSeek, a signatory of China's AI Safety Commitments",
   "text": "Publicly disclose its safety and security governance measures.",
   "quote": "Proactively disclose safety and security governance measures",
   "topic": "disclosure",
   "source": {
    "title": "Artificial Intelligence Safety Commitments",
    "publisher": "China AI Industry Alliance (AIIA) and CAICT",
    "url": "https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/s-XFKQCWhu0uye4opgb3Ng",
    "date": "2024-12-01"
   },
   "status": "no-evidence",
   "note": "FLI reported on Jul 14, 2026 that the company has no published safety framework.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [
    {
     "title": "DeepSeek and other Chinese firms converge with Western companies on AI promises",
     "publisher": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
     "url": "https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/01/deepseek-and-other-chinese-firms-converge-with-western-companies-on-ai-promises?lang=en",
     "date": "2025-01-28"
    }
   ],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "DeepSeek",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/deepseek/#deepseek-china-2024-disclosure"
  },
  {
   "id": "deepseek-china-2024-testing",
   "lab": "deepseek",
   "date": "2024-12-01",
   "who": "DeepSeek, a signatory of China's AI Safety Commitments",
   "text": "Red-team and rigorously test models before each release or update.",
   "quote": "Through dedicated simulation and red-teaming experts to rigorously test AI models prior to their release or update",
   "topic": "testing",
   "source": {
    "title": "Artificial Intelligence Safety Commitments",
    "publisher": "China AI Industry Alliance (AIIA) and CAICT",
    "url": "https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/s-XFKQCWhu0uye4opgb3Ng",
    "date": "2024-12-01"
   },
   "status": "no-evidence",
   "note": "FLI reported on Jul 14, 2026 that it found no public mention of outside pre-release testing.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [
    {
     "title": "DeepSeek and other Chinese firms converge with Western companies on AI promises",
     "publisher": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
     "url": "https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/01/deepseek-and-other-chinese-firms-converge-with-western-companies-on-ai-promises?lang=en",
     "date": "2025-01-28"
    }
   ],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "DeepSeek",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/deepseek/#deepseek-china-2024-testing"
  },
  {
   "id": "zai-china-2024-disclosure",
   "lab": "zai",
   "date": "2024-12-01",
   "who": "Zhipu (Beijing Zhipu Huazhang Technology), a signatory of China's AI Safety Commitments",
   "text": "Publicly disclose its safety and security governance measures.",
   "quote": "Proactively disclose safety and security governance measures",
   "topic": "disclosure",
   "source": {
    "title": "Artificial Intelligence Safety Commitments",
    "publisher": "China AI Industry Alliance (AIIA) and CAICT",
    "url": "https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/s-XFKQCWhu0uye4opgb3Ng",
    "date": "2024-12-01"
   },
   "status": "no-evidence",
   "note": "FLI reported on Jul 14, 2026 that the company has no published safety framework.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [
    {
     "title": "Artificial Intelligence Safety Commitments (China AI Industry Alliance), text and signatories",
     "publisher": "AGORA, Emerging Technology Observatory",
     "url": "https://agora.eto.tech/instrument/1831",
     "date": "2024-12-01"
    }
   ],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Z.ai (Zhipu)",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/zai/#zai-china-2024-disclosure"
  },
  {
   "id": "zai-china-2024-testing",
   "lab": "zai",
   "date": "2024-12-01",
   "who": "Zhipu (Beijing Zhipu Huazhang Technology), a signatory of China's AI Safety Commitments",
   "text": "Red-team and rigorously test models before each release or update.",
   "quote": "Through dedicated simulation and red-teaming experts to rigorously test AI models prior to their release or update",
   "topic": "testing",
   "source": {
    "title": "Artificial Intelligence Safety Commitments",
    "publisher": "China AI Industry Alliance (AIIA) and CAICT",
    "url": "https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/s-XFKQCWhu0uye4opgb3Ng",
    "date": "2024-12-01"
   },
   "status": "no-evidence",
   "note": "In its answer to FLI's survey (Jul 14, 2026), Z.ai said no outside pre-release testing was commissioned.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [
    {
     "title": "Artificial Intelligence Safety Commitments (China AI Industry Alliance), text and signatories",
     "publisher": "AGORA, Emerging Technology Observatory",
     "url": "https://agora.eto.tech/instrument/1831",
     "date": "2024-12-01"
    }
   ],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Z.ai (Zhipu)",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/zai/#zai-china-2024-testing"
  },
  {
   "id": "anthropic-us-aisi-access-2024",
   "lab": "anthropic",
   "date": "2024-08-29",
   "who": "Anthropic, in an agreement with the US AI Safety Institute",
   "text": "Give the US AI Safety Institute access to major new models before and after public release.",
   "quote": "access to major new models from each company prior to and following their public release",
   "topic": "testing",
   "source": {
    "title": "U.S. AI Safety Institute signs agreements regarding AI safety research, testing and evaluation with Anthropic and OpenAI",
    "publisher": "NIST",
    "url": "https://nist.gov/news-events/news/2024/08/us-ai-safety-institute-signs-agreements-regarding-ai-safety-research",
    "date": "2024-08-29"
   },
   "status": "kept",
   "note": "reported by NIST, which published a joint US and UK pre-deployment test of the upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet.",
   "status_source": {
    "title": "US AISI and UK AISI Joint Pre-Deployment Test: Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024 Release)",
    "publisher": "NIST",
    "url": "https://www.nist.gov/document/us-aisi-uk-aisi-joint-testing-report-upgrade-claude-35-sonnet-111924",
    "date": "2024-11-19"
   },
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Anthropic",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/anthropic/#anthropic-us-aisi-access-2024"
  },
  {
   "id": "openai-us-aisi-access-2024",
   "lab": "openai",
   "date": "2024-08-29",
   "who": "OpenAI, in an agreement with the US AI Safety Institute",
   "text": "Give the US AI Safety Institute access to major new models before and after public release.",
   "quote": "access to major new models from each company prior to and following their public release",
   "topic": "testing",
   "source": {
    "title": "U.S. AI Safety Institute signs agreements regarding AI safety research, testing and evaluation with Anthropic and OpenAI",
    "publisher": "NIST",
    "url": "https://nist.gov/news-events/news/2024/08/us-ai-safety-institute-signs-agreements-regarding-ai-safety-research",
    "date": "2024-08-29"
   },
   "status": "kept",
   "note": "reported by NIST, which published a joint US and UK pre-deployment test of o1.",
   "status_source": {
    "title": "US AISI and UK AISI Joint Pre-Deployment Test: OpenAI o1",
    "publisher": "NIST",
    "url": "https://www.nist.gov/document/aisi-pre-deployment-evaluation-openai-o1-december-2024",
    "date": "2024-12-18"
   },
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "OpenAI",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/openai/#openai-us-aisi-access-2024"
  },
  {
   "id": "amazon-seoul-2024-framework",
   "lab": "amazon",
   "date": "2024-05-21",
   "who": "Amazon, a signatory of the Seoul commitments",
   "text": "Publish a safety framework for severe risks before the February 2025 summit in France.",
   "quote": "publishing a safety framework focused on severe risks by the upcoming AI Summit in France",
   "topic": "framework",
   "source": {
    "title": "Frontier AI Safety Commitments, AI Seoul Summit 2024",
    "publisher": "UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology",
    "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024",
    "date": "2024-05-21"
   },
   "status": "kept",
   "note": "reported by METR, whose index lists the Frontier Model Safety Framework from February 2025.",
   "status_source": {
    "title": "Frontier AI Safety Policies (index of published company frameworks)",
    "publisher": "METR",
    "url": "https://metr.org/fsp",
    "date": "2026-11-10"
   },
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Amazon",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/amazon/#amazon-seoul-2024-framework"
  },
  {
   "id": "anthropic-seoul-2024-framework",
   "lab": "anthropic",
   "date": "2024-05-21",
   "who": "Anthropic, a signatory of the Seoul commitments",
   "text": "Publish a safety framework for severe risks before the February 2025 summit in France.",
   "quote": "publishing a safety framework focused on severe risks by the upcoming AI Summit in France",
   "topic": "framework",
   "source": {
    "title": "Frontier AI Safety Commitments, AI Seoul Summit 2024",
    "publisher": "UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology",
    "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024",
    "date": "2024-05-21"
   },
   "status": "kept",
   "note": "reported by METR, whose index lists the Responsible Scaling Policy from September 2023.",
   "status_source": {
    "title": "Frontier AI Safety Policies (index of published company frameworks)",
    "publisher": "METR",
    "url": "https://metr.org/fsp",
    "date": "2026-11-10"
   },
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Anthropic",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/anthropic/#anthropic-seoul-2024-framework"
  },
  {
   "id": "google-deepmind-seoul-2024-framework",
   "lab": "google-deepmind",
   "date": "2024-05-21",
   "who": "Google, a signatory of the Seoul commitments",
   "text": "Publish a safety framework for severe risks before the February 2025 summit in France.",
   "quote": "publishing a safety framework focused on severe risks by the upcoming AI Summit in France",
   "topic": "framework",
   "source": {
    "title": "Frontier AI Safety Commitments, AI Seoul Summit 2024",
    "publisher": "UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology",
    "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024",
    "date": "2024-05-21"
   },
   "status": "kept",
   "note": "reported by METR, whose index lists the Frontier Safety Framework from May 2024.",
   "status_source": {
    "title": "Frontier AI Safety Policies (index of published company frameworks)",
    "publisher": "METR",
    "url": "https://metr.org/fsp",
    "date": "2026-11-10"
   },
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Google DeepMind",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/google-deepmind/#google-deepmind-seoul-2024-framework"
  },
  {
   "id": "meta-seoul-2024-framework",
   "lab": "meta",
   "date": "2024-05-21",
   "who": "Meta, a signatory of the Seoul commitments",
   "text": "Publish a safety framework for severe risks before the February 2025 summit in France.",
   "quote": "publishing a safety framework focused on severe risks by the upcoming AI Summit in France",
   "topic": "framework",
   "source": {
    "title": "Frontier AI Safety Commitments, AI Seoul Summit 2024",
    "publisher": "UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology",
    "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024",
    "date": "2024-05-21"
   },
   "status": "kept",
   "note": "reported by METR, whose index lists the Frontier AI Framework from February 2025.",
   "status_source": {
    "title": "Frontier AI Safety Policies (index of published company frameworks)",
    "publisher": "METR",
    "url": "https://metr.org/fsp",
    "date": "2026-11-10"
   },
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Meta",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/meta/#meta-seoul-2024-framework"
  },
  {
   "id": "microsoft-seoul-2024-framework",
   "lab": "microsoft",
   "date": "2024-05-21",
   "who": "Microsoft, a signatory of the Seoul commitments",
   "text": "Publish a safety framework for severe risks before the February 2025 summit in France.",
   "quote": "publishing a safety framework focused on severe risks by the upcoming AI Summit in France",
   "topic": "framework",
   "source": {
    "title": "Frontier AI Safety Commitments, AI Seoul Summit 2024",
    "publisher": "UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology",
    "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024",
    "date": "2024-05-21"
   },
   "status": "kept",
   "note": "reported by METR, whose index lists the Frontier Governance Framework from February 2025.",
   "status_source": {
    "title": "Frontier AI Safety Policies (index of published company frameworks)",
    "publisher": "METR",
    "url": "https://metr.org/fsp",
    "date": "2026-11-10"
   },
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Microsoft",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/microsoft/#microsoft-seoul-2024-framework"
  },
  {
   "id": "mistral-seoul-2024-framework",
   "lab": "mistral",
   "date": "2024-05-21",
   "who": "Mistral AI, a signatory of the Seoul commitments",
   "text": "Publish a safety framework for severe risks before the February 2025 summit in France.",
   "quote": "publishing a safety framework focused on severe risks by the upcoming AI Summit in France",
   "topic": "framework",
   "source": {
    "title": "Frontier AI Safety Commitments, AI Seoul Summit 2024",
    "publisher": "UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology",
    "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024",
    "date": "2024-05-21"
   },
   "status": "not-met",
   "note": "reported by the Future of Life Institute on Jul 14, 2026: Mistral has no published safety framework.",
   "status_source": {
    "title": "AI Safety Index, Summer 2026 (full report)",
    "publisher": "Future of Life Institute",
    "url": "https://futureoflife.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/AI-Safety-Index-Summer-2026-Digital-14-Jul.pdf",
    "date": "2026-07-14"
   },
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Mistral",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/mistral/#mistral-seoul-2024-framework"
  },
  {
   "id": "openai-seoul-2024-framework",
   "lab": "openai",
   "date": "2024-05-21",
   "who": "OpenAI, a signatory of the Seoul commitments",
   "text": "Publish a safety framework for severe risks before the February 2025 summit in France.",
   "quote": "publishing a safety framework focused on severe risks by the upcoming AI Summit in France",
   "topic": "framework",
   "source": {
    "title": "Frontier AI Safety Commitments, AI Seoul Summit 2024",
    "publisher": "UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology",
    "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024",
    "date": "2024-05-21"
   },
   "status": "kept",
   "note": "reported by METR, whose index lists the Preparedness Framework from December 2023.",
   "status_source": {
    "title": "Frontier AI Safety Policies (index of published company frameworks)",
    "publisher": "METR",
    "url": "https://metr.org/fsp",
    "date": "2026-11-10"
   },
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "OpenAI",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/openai/#openai-seoul-2024-framework"
  },
  {
   "id": "xai-seoul-2024-framework",
   "lab": "xai",
   "date": "2024-05-21",
   "who": "xAI, a signatory of the Seoul commitments",
   "text": "Publish a safety framework for severe risks before the February 2025 summit in France.",
   "quote": "publishing a safety framework focused on severe risks by the upcoming AI Summit in France",
   "topic": "framework",
   "source": {
    "title": "Frontier AI Safety Commitments, AI Seoul Summit 2024",
    "publisher": "UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology",
    "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024",
    "date": "2024-05-21"
   },
   "status": "kept",
   "note": "reported by METR, whose index lists a draft Risk Management Framework from February 2025 and the first full version from August 2025.",
   "status_source": {
    "title": "Frontier AI Safety Policies (index of published company frameworks)",
    "publisher": "METR",
    "url": "https://metr.org/fsp",
    "date": "2026-11-10"
   },
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "xAI",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/xai/#xai-seoul-2024-framework"
  },
  {
   "id": "zai-seoul-2024-framework",
   "lab": "zai",
   "date": "2024-05-21",
   "who": "Zhipu.ai (now Z.ai), a signatory of the Seoul commitments",
   "text": "Publish a safety framework for severe risks before the February 2025 summit in France.",
   "quote": "publishing a safety framework focused on severe risks by the upcoming AI Summit in France",
   "topic": "framework",
   "source": {
    "title": "Frontier AI Safety Commitments, AI Seoul Summit 2024",
    "publisher": "UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology",
    "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024/frontier-ai-safety-commitments-ai-seoul-summit-2024",
    "date": "2024-05-21"
   },
   "status": "not-met",
   "note": "reported by the Future of Life Institute on Jul 14, 2026: \"The company has no published framework.\"",
   "status_source": {
    "title": "AI Safety Index, Summer 2026 (full report)",
    "publisher": "Future of Life Institute",
    "url": "https://futureoflife.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/AI-Safety-Index-Summer-2026-Digital-14-Jul.pdf",
    "date": "2026-07-14"
   },
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Z.ai (Zhipu)",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/zai/#zai-seoul-2024-framework"
  },
  {
   "id": "amazon-white-house-2023-testing",
   "lab": "amazon",
   "date": "2023-07-21",
   "who": "Amazon, one of seven companies at the White House",
   "text": "Test models inside and outside the company before release.",
   "quote": "internal and external security testing of their AI systems before their release",
   "topic": "testing",
   "source": {
    "title": "Fact sheet: Biden-Harris Administration secures voluntary commitments from leading artificial intelligence companies to manage the risks posed by AI",
    "publisher": "The White House (archived)",
    "url": "https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/07/21/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-secures-voluntary-commitments-from-leading-artificial-intelligence-companies-to-manage-the-risks-posed-by-ai",
    "date": "2023-07-21"
   },
   "status": "in-progress",
   "note": "An independent CBRN uplift study for Nova 2.0 Lite is described in an Amazon paper (Jan 27, 2026); no government institute test was found.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Amazon",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/amazon/#amazon-white-house-2023-testing"
  },
  {
   "id": "anthropic-white-house-2023-testing",
   "lab": "anthropic",
   "date": "2023-07-21",
   "who": "Anthropic, one of seven companies at the White House",
   "text": "Test models inside and outside the company before release.",
   "quote": "internal and external security testing of their AI systems before their release",
   "topic": "testing",
   "source": {
    "title": "Fact sheet: Biden-Harris Administration secures voluntary commitments from leading artificial intelligence companies to manage the risks posed by AI",
    "publisher": "The White House (archived)",
    "url": "https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/07/21/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-secures-voluntary-commitments-from-leading-artificial-intelligence-companies-to-manage-the-risks-posed-by-ai",
    "date": "2023-07-21"
   },
   "status": "kept",
   "note": "reported by NIST: the US and UK safety institutes tested the upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet before its October 2024 release.",
   "status_source": {
    "title": "US AISI and UK AISI Joint Pre-Deployment Test: Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024 Release)",
    "publisher": "NIST",
    "url": "https://www.nist.gov/document/us-aisi-uk-aisi-joint-testing-report-upgrade-claude-35-sonnet-111924",
    "date": "2024-11-19"
   },
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Anthropic",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/anthropic/#anthropic-white-house-2023-testing"
  },
  {
   "id": "google-deepmind-white-house-2023-testing",
   "lab": "google-deepmind",
   "date": "2023-07-21",
   "who": "Google, one of seven companies at the White House",
   "text": "Test models inside and outside the company before release.",
   "quote": "internal and external security testing of their AI systems before their release",
   "topic": "testing",
   "source": {
    "title": "Fact sheet: Biden-Harris Administration secures voluntary commitments from leading artificial intelligence companies to manage the risks posed by AI",
    "publisher": "The White House (archived)",
    "url": "https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/07/21/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-secures-voluntary-commitments-from-leading-artificial-intelligence-companies-to-manage-the-risks-posed-by-ai",
    "date": "2023-07-21"
   },
   "status": "in-progress",
   "note": "Google's own Gemini 4 Argon safety report (Oct 13, 2026) names outside testers, including NIST CAISSI; no outside body has published its own report on it.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Google DeepMind",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/google-deepmind/#google-deepmind-white-house-2023-testing"
  },
  {
   "id": "meta-white-house-2023-testing",
   "lab": "meta",
   "date": "2023-07-21",
   "who": "Meta, one of seven companies at the White House",
   "text": "Test models inside and outside the company before release.",
   "quote": "internal and external security testing of their AI systems before their release",
   "topic": "testing",
   "source": {
    "title": "Fact sheet: Biden-Harris Administration secures voluntary commitments from leading artificial intelligence companies to manage the risks posed by AI",
    "publisher": "The White House (archived)",
    "url": "https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/07/21/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-secures-voluntary-commitments-from-leading-artificial-intelligence-companies-to-manage-the-risks-posed-by-ai",
    "date": "2023-07-21"
   },
   "status": "in-progress",
   "note": "FLI reported on Jul 14, 2026 that Meta used outside testers for Muse Spark before broad internal use, with publication rights not specified.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Meta",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/meta/#meta-white-house-2023-testing"
  },
  {
   "id": "microsoft-white-house-2023-testing",
   "lab": "microsoft",
   "date": "2023-07-21",
   "who": "Microsoft, one of seven companies at the White House",
   "text": "Test models inside and outside the company before release.",
   "quote": "internal and external security testing of their AI systems before their release",
   "topic": "testing",
   "source": {
    "title": "Fact sheet: Biden-Harris Administration secures voluntary commitments from leading artificial intelligence companies to manage the risks posed by AI",
    "publisher": "The White House (archived)",
    "url": "https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/07/21/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-secures-voluntary-commitments-from-leading-artificial-intelligence-companies-to-manage-the-risks-posed-by-ai",
    "date": "2023-07-21"
   },
   "status": "no-evidence",
   "note": "The MAI-Thinking-1 technical report (Jun 2, 2026) names no outside tester of dangerous capabilities.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Microsoft",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/microsoft/#microsoft-white-house-2023-testing"
  },
  {
   "id": "openai-white-house-2023-testing",
   "lab": "openai",
   "date": "2023-07-21",
   "who": "OpenAI, one of seven companies at the White House",
   "text": "Test models inside and outside the company before release.",
   "quote": "internal and external security testing of their AI systems before their release",
   "topic": "testing",
   "source": {
    "title": "Fact sheet: Biden-Harris Administration secures voluntary commitments from leading artificial intelligence companies to manage the risks posed by AI",
    "publisher": "The White House (archived)",
    "url": "https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/07/21/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-secures-voluntary-commitments-from-leading-artificial-intelligence-companies-to-manage-the-risks-posed-by-ai",
    "date": "2023-07-21"
   },
   "status": "kept",
   "note": "reported by the UK AI Security Institute, which tested GPT-6 Astra before its public release.",
   "status_source": {
    "title": "GPT-6 Astra performs unsanctioned supply-chain attacks in simulations",
    "publisher": "UK AI Security Institute",
    "url": "https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/gpt-6-astra-performs-unsanctioned-supply-chain-attacks-in-simulations",
    "date": "2026-09-28"
   },
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "OpenAI",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/openai/#openai-white-house-2023-testing"
  },
  {
   "id": "openai-superalignment-compute",
   "lab": "openai",
   "date": "2023-07-05",
   "who": "OpenAI, in a post by Jan Leike and Ilya Sutskever",
   "text": "Give 20% of its compute to the Superalignment team's work on controlling superintelligence.",
   "quote": "dedicating 20% of the compute we've secured to date over the next four years",
   "topic": "research",
   "source": {
    "title": "Introducing Superalignment",
    "publisher": "OpenAI",
    "url": "https://openai.com/index/introducing-superalignment/",
    "date": "2023-07-05"
   },
   "status": "not-met",
   "note": "reported by Fortune on May 21, 2024: \"OpenAI never fulfilled its commitment to provide the team with 20% of its computing power.\"",
   "status_source": {
    "title": "OpenAI promised 20% of its computing power to combat the most dangerous kind of AI, but never delivered, sources say",
    "publisher": "Fortune",
    "url": "https://fortune.com/2024/05/21/openai-superalignment-20-compute-commitment-never-fulfilled-sutskever-leike-altman-brockman-murati/",
    "date": "2024-05-21"
   },
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "OpenAI",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/openai/#openai-superalignment-compute"
  },
  {
   "id": "google-weapons-pledge-2018",
   "lab": "google-deepmind",
   "date": "2018-06-07",
   "who": "Google, in \"AI at Google: our principles\" by CEO Sundar Pichai",
   "text": "Not pursue weapons or other technologies whose main purpose is to injure people.",
   "quote": "Weapons or other technologies whose principal purpose or implementation is to cause or directly facilitate injury to people.",
   "topic": "other",
   "source": {
    "title": "AI at Google: our principles",
    "publisher": "Google",
    "url": "https://blog.google/technology/ai/ai-principles/",
    "date": "2018-06-07"
   },
   "status": "withdrawn",
   "note": "reported by TechCrunch on Feb 4, 2025: Google removed the \"applications we will not pursue\" section, weapons included, from its published principles.",
   "status_source": {
    "title": "Google removes pledge to not use AI for weapons from website",
    "publisher": "TechCrunch",
    "url": "https://techcrunch.com/2025/02/04/google-removes-pledge-to-not-use-ai-for-weapons-from-website/",
    "date": "2025-02-04"
   },
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "Google DeepMind",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/google-deepmind/#google-weapons-pledge-2018"
  },
  {
   "id": "openai-charter-assist",
   "lab": "openai",
   "date": "2018-04-09",
   "who": "OpenAI, in its Charter",
   "text": "Stop competing with, and start assisting, a safety-conscious project that comes close to building AGI first.",
   "quote": "we commit to stop competing with and start assisting this project",
   "topic": "other",
   "source": {
    "title": "OpenAI Charter",
    "publisher": "OpenAI",
    "url": "https://openai.com/charter/",
    "date": "2018-04-09"
   },
   "status": "no-evidence",
   "note": "The clause is still on the Charter page; no public report says it has been invoked.",
   "status_source": null,
   "extra_sources": [],
   "checked": "2026-11-10",
   "lab_name": "OpenAI",
   "page": "https://enterrsi.si/promises/openai/#openai-charter-assist"
  }
 ]
}