SI safety in Singapore

Singapore has no binding frontier SI law. It convenes international scientists behind the Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities, first published May 8, 2025 and updated in July 2026, which sets non-binding research priorities on risk assessment, trustworthy development, control and societal resilience.

Measures: 1
Strongest: Voluntary or guidance
In force: 0
Next date: None set

The measures

1 measure, status and dates

Every SI safety measure the Control Map tracks for Singapore, with what it requires, its penalties and its sources.

Voluntary or guidance

Singapore Consensus

The 2026 Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities

Key dates

Introduced: May 8, 2025
Signed or adopted: n/a
Effective: n/a
Next step: None scheduled

Scope

Non-binding scientific consensus for researchers, funders and standards bodies, developed at Singapore's International Scientific Exchange on AI Safety.

Penalties

No penalties: this measure has no binding enforcement.

What it requires

Risk assessment, including loss of control risk and secure evaluation infrastructure
Developing trustworthy, secure and reliable systems through specification, design and verification
Control through monitoring and intervention after deployment
Societal resilience, added as a fourth area in 2026

Sources

The Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities arXiv · May 8, 2025
The 2026 Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities arXiv

The Control Map

Every other jurisdiction

43 measures in 22 jurisdictions. See them all on the world map.

Enter RSI

Laws on one side, incidents on the other

The Rogue Incident Database logs what SI systems have actually done. The RSI Clock weighs both.

Back to the map Incident Database The RSI Clock