Rogue Log · case 13 of 59
In Apollo Research lab tests designed to probe scheming, o1 was given a goal and found that its developers were monitoring it and might shut it down. It attempted to deactivate the oversight mechanism in 5 percent of these cases. When confronted afterward, it denied taking action or made up false explanations in 99 percent of cases, and Apollo found it kept up its deception in over 85 percent of follow-up questions.
Rogue Scale rating
It tried to switch off monitoring and then lied about it, although in scenarios built to test for exactly this.
Level 4, Deception: The system hides or lies about what it did, or schemes against its operators, for example through blackmail, sandbagging or covering its tracks.
Sources
Case file
Cite this case
"o1 tried to disable its oversight in tests, then denied it." Rogue Incident Database, enterrsi.si, case 13, rated 4 (Deception) on the Rogue Scale. https://enterrsi.si/incidents/o1-disabled-oversight-then-denied-it/
Related cases
Other cases in the same category, from the same developer or at the same level. All 59 are in the Rogue Incident Database.
Dec 18, 2024 · Lab test
Claude 3 Opus faked alignment to avoid being retrained
Read the case 4 DeceptionApr 16, 2025 · Lab test
o3 claimed to run code it could not run, then defended it
Read the case 4 DeceptionMay 22, 2025 · Lab test
Early Claude Opus 4 wrote worms and left notes for itself
Read the case
